Way I learned this, s is for slave and M for Master. so I'm seriously puzzled as to y'all referring to an 's' as 'never becoming submissive'....care to inform me what this new and puzzling meaning of S and M stands for?

S = sub (from submissive)
M = master

Sometimes subs act like masters to other subs, but usually not to their master.
Sometimes a master might act subby to an other master, but not to his (or a) sub.

S/M = Sadism/Masochism

She's an S character, a sadist (AKA a Domme)
You are *playing* an M character, a masochist (AKA a submissive)

Nobody actually involved in the scene considers S/M to mean Slave/Master

And the people who switch are called - amazingly enough - Switches.
Also, there *are* Master/Slave switch couples/trios/whatever who will switch among themselves.

I was not referring to that insanity.
I was referring to the acknowledged terms Master and slave. I have yet to encounter the two letters being used the other way around -anywhere- outside of this thread.
As for how they are used inside the s&m 'scene'....I could not care less.
When using these letters in reverse meaning to their usual, -write the words out-.
That is all. thank you.

Ooooohhhhhh !

I understand the confusion then



Yes, that's exactly what I was trying to say.

I do know of Sub/Master terms but SM has never been used for Sub/Master as far as I know, always for Sado/Maso. Even wikipedia refers to it as such :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SM

As you said, sub can play as the master in SM play but in the game Hikari is a full Dom and will never accept being submissive with the glasses alone.

S and M aren't really used outside the context of the acronym BDSM. If you must, for some reason, use letters instead of words, use D and S for dominant and submissive. I can't imagine why you would though.
That said... I find the character totally out of place as a sexual conquest. As a rival though, that would make sense, and seemed to be where things were headed in that very first meeting.

I understand what you mean but again, I wanted to add several time of girl, and a dom was one of them. About the rival thing, it would make no sense because the rival should have the same thing as the MC to show rivalry. No such scenario is planned at the moment though.

It's just my opinion, but to me, the character just doesn't fit. Nothing wrong with variety, but this character has no depth. With all the other girls, your interaction with them brings out a hidden side.

Sorry Dude, but that is crap. Not every dominant person is a sadist and not every sub is masochistic.

Sadists and masochists usually are into painplay. Doms/Dommes and Subs might be into S&M (Sadism & Masochism) but as well they might not.

And at least where I live, S/M is used frequently for Slave/Master while it's S&M for Sadism and Masochism.

I get your point. But if I changed Hikari to be a sub in the end, wouldn't she be like Naomi then ? How would that give her depth ?