Hallo,

I say it again. This is one of the best game i have see.

Look to other 3D-worlds and games.

-Take the user a template for the glothes-texture.

-take the use a storyboardprogram to make little adventures for free sex part.

- the game-person AI is not the best. You use the same in DEmo and game. That a perfect user part. Use standart AIML and it is perfect.

- show us your modelsource then other users can convert other models in this format.

- open a user part in forum for this tools.

Let the user make it self and you have the right it to use in this game!
The interface for this is the "free sex"-part.

- the greatest mistake is your restrict to 2 GHZ prozessor. 2/3 all user use old windows PC.
they can not play this game. You say you use OPENGL! i missed the DLL'S.
OpenGL2.0 can make 3D! You need not the special graphiccard.

- Which Renderengine you use?

Excuse my bad english. You will seee....... more user ... more fun.

@Josefus

We use a custom build engine for both the physics and rendering. So except for OpenGl and DirectX we do not use a third party rendering engine.

Its true we aim at newer PC systems. We realize that this means older systems are not always supported but that's are trade-off we need to make.

Thanks for your feedback

thank you.

You know SecondLive, RedLight-Center, secret city?

This works under Window for Workgroup.! - 1GHZ PC.
I think you can make a other version for the older PC-world!
Where is your problem for this option? DirectX or OpenGL?
Look at Sexsim or SexVilla. That are very special-worlds. But look...what the user can do self. They can modify the models. Can insert new textures and last not least ...new objects.

The developer participiere from this USER-PART.

Heee, i like this program. I work since over 30 Years in 3D. This is one of the best concept what i see.
Iif you will be longer in this world you must build a Interface for users.

Nice weekend.

@Josefus

Next release will have more options for modding.

The reason we do not support older PC's is because it would require us to make a special (simpler) version of XStoryPlayer.
We do not have the resources to do this. All of our resources currently go into advancing XStoryPlayer further.